A tweet brought me to a PeerJ blog post on the uptake of open peer review. The post is worth reading. At PeerJ open review is an option – authors and reviewers can opt in or out, and only if both opt in is the reviewing history of a paper published. One thing that caught my eye was that while 80% of authors opt in, the total number of paper with open reviews is just 40%, which indicates that reviewers are more reticent. (more…)
Archive for March 12th, 2016
We are afraid
Posted in Open Access, Peer review, Science process, Science publishing, tagged research, science, Science progress on March 12, 2016|
Places of interest
The one and only PhD comics, the guide to being a graduate and to mentoring.
Improbable Research and the Ig Nobels
Retraction Watch provides updates on retractions of articles.
Office for Research Integrity, their video should be compulsory for all.
Centre for Alternative Technology
Lateral Science, has some quite stunning information - well worth a browse.
Fascinating places that have been closed by lawyers
Science Fraud, shut down due to legal threats on Jan 3 2013. and Abnormal Science
Blogroll
Funding agencies
Seminars
Archives
- November 2022
- July 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- May 2021
- March 2021
- August 2020
- June 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- December 2019
- October 2019
- July 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- January 2019
- September 2018
- August 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- January 2017
- October 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- March 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
Follow me on Twitter
My TweetsCloud
American Civil War antithrombin III banana Biological imaging biotechnology Brexit Choanoflagellates chocolate chondroitin sulfate coagulation Confederate States covid19 DN Lee Education EU EU referendum Europe extracellular matrix FGF Fibroblast growth factor Food FRET sensors Gish Gallop glycosaminoglycans GMO government Graduate students heparan sulfate heparin history of science imaging Irvine Stephens Bulloch James Bulloch James Dunwoody Bulloch Liverpool microbiology Nanoparticle Nanoparticles Nanotechnology neuroscience nmr Open Access Open Data orange Parliament Peer Review PhD polysaccharide port sunlight Post publication peer review protein chemistry REF research Research Excellence Framework Research integrity Roast SARS-CoV-2 science Science and Technology Committee Science fraud Science Funding Science progress Scientific American Seminars sorbet speaking strawberry sulfation Sulfotransferase synthetic biology Teaching technology transfer Tourism Travel Universities
Ferniglab Blog 