Update June 5
Standards, who needs them? I am just back from the E-MRS spring meeting in Strasbourg, which was most enjoyable, though someone seems to have forgotten about the “Spring” bit. Meanwhile, out in the world of science we continue to witness ridiculous decisions regarding manipulated and falsified data by journals and a quite stunning self-justification by a materials scientist who looks to be the next serial fraudster. (more…)
Archive for May 31st, 2013
When rigour deserts science we are left with quackery
Posted in Imaging, Nanotechnology, Post publication peer review, Research integrity, Science process, Science publishing, tagged imaging, Nanoparticle, Nanoparticles, Nanotechnology, research, Research integrity, science, Science fraud, Science progress on May 31, 2013| 6 Comments »